Animal testing essay animal testing is use of animals in experimental ways for the benefit of biomedical research, and it has been a topic long argued about to every argument, there are two sides: the american medical association (ama) and the people for the ethical treatment of humans (peta. In summary, defenders of animal experimentation argue that humans have higher moral status than animals and fundamental rights that animals lack accordingly, potential animal rights violations are outweighed by the greater human benefits of animal research. Animal testing is animal cruelty essay 1880 words | 8 pages animal testing is animal cruelty the way i look at animal testing is a form hateful cruelty none of these people care about if it hurts or kills the animals the cruelty has been going on long enough and i think it is time to stop.
- for animal rights in this essay i will be discussing the cruel acts of animal torture and testing animals have been tortured to death by substances such as drugs, cosmetics, diseases, tobacco, alcohol, detergent and other poisons. Animal rights essay - model answer some people believe that animals should be treated in the same way humans are and have similar rights, whereas others think that it is more important to use them as we desire for food and medical research this essay will discuss both points of view. Animal testing may harm many distinct species of animals for our selfish needs of becoming protected and no damage coming to humans many animals are at risk when scientists examine on them for goods animals do not have the required demand for them. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals' rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other means of testing product toxicity are available. Animal testing persuasive essay animal testing persuasive essay 706 words nov 27th, 2012 3 pages just because humans are considered a more powerful species, doesn’t give us the right to treat animals as if they are nothing would you want to be treated that way by a more dominant species just for their benefit it is clearly unfair.
Recently, many animal rights activists have turned their focus to animal experimentation, which has become one of today's largest controversies many animal rights activists see their fight against animal experimentation as a simple matter of moral duty, of ethics, or even of religious obligation.
In the essay, “nonhuman animal rights: sorely neglected,” author tom regan asserts that animals have rights based upon inherent value of experiencing subjects of a life regan’s argument will first be expressed, later explained, and evaluated in further detail. According to data collected by f barbara orlans for her book, in the name of science: issues in responsible animal experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62) people have different feelings for animals many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research.
The safety testing of chemicals and consumer products probably accounts for only about 10% to 20% of the use of animals in laboratories, or approximately two to four million animals in the united states, yet this relatively small amount has caused quite a bit of controversy. Animal testing is regarded as unkind treatment towards animals as it violates animal rights as their lives are valuable as well (le fanu, 2003) nevertheless, their arguments are weak because animals lack the sense of judgment, and therefore are not subjected to moral claims and animal rights (cohen, 1986.